Batteries and motors

It’s the last day of August – nearly a month since the last update! I’d like to say things have been moving at a furious pace but that’d be a lie. It’s been a busy month with travel, the Monterey car week (I met Cristian von Koenigsegg!), along with improved work on PassionList. I have a build date from Caterham for the chassis – early December. In the next few days I’m going to sign on a shop in Belmont – finding appropriate space was more difficult and time consuming than I had anticipated.

I’ve also been doing quite a bit of research on batteries and motors and decided that I’ll be going with Li-ion battery packs and an AC motor. My reasoning follows…

Batteries

In looking at EV applications, we’re basically dealing with three different battery types – lead acid, Nickel-based, and Lithium-based.

Lead acid

Lead acid batteries are familiar to us all – they’re in our cars as starter batteries and in electric wheelchairs, golf cars, forklifts, and many other applications. They’ve been around for a while and a known quantity. Many of the first EVs ran off lead acid batteries, including the EV1 .

When looking at an EV application, here are the pros and cons:

Pros

– inexpensive – low cost per watt-hour

– low self discharge

– capable of high discharge

– performances well across a broad range of temperatures

Cons

– low specific energy (low watt-hours per kilogram)

– slow to charge

– limited number of full cycles

Lead acid were a good choice for a long time, however battery tech has improved and given us better options.

Nickel-based

Nickel-based batteries have been a popular choice for portable devices and are at least a look. Mostly we’re dealing with Nickel-cadmium (NiCd) and Nickel-metal-hydride (NiMH).

Pros

– rugged, high cycle count

– takes well to ultra-fast charging

– long shelf life

– low cost per cycle

Cons

– low specific energy

– needs periodic full discharges

– high self discharge

– low cell voltage (1.20V)

Lithium-based

Finally we get to Lithium- based batteries – in the EV space these are the ones of choice these days (at least at the OEM level)

Pros

– high specific energy and load capacity

– long cycle life

– short charge times

– low self discharge

Cons

– requires protection circuit to prevent thermal runaway (i.e. blowing up)

– transportation regulations

– relatively expensive

For my application, it basically boils down to the following – lead acid are too heavy, Nickel-based are heavy and require too many for my needs, which leaves Lithium-based – the next decision will be what specific chemistry. That will boil down to a few other factors, most of which will be constrained by whichever supplier I decide on. Before I embark on that path there’s plenty to decide however.

Motors

This is a slightly easier question – AC (alternating current) vs DC (direct current). Many DIY EVs out there went with DC motors for plenty of good reasons – they were easier to source, less expensive, simpler, and required less voltage. Times are a changing, and there are several good reasons to prefer an AC motor in a modern EV.

– Regenerative braking! DC setups require a specialized controller for this, whereas an AC system is symmetrical in this regard. This improves efficiency drastically.

– Better torque characteristics – AC motors have a wider torque band.

– No motor brushes – this improves reliability and decreases service needs

– safety – if a DC power stage fails, the entire pack voltage is applied to the motor. That’s not a good situation. If an AC inverter fails you simply go nowhere.

It’s no surprise that every OEM EV out there today runs an AC setup.

Much of this material is from Battery University and Metric Mind.

Committing resources

One of the fundamental tenets of decision analysis is that a decision hasn’t been made until resources have been committed. Outside of my time writing up this blog, brainstorming, chatting with people, and research, no resources had yet been committed – this project was effectively just an idea.

Well last Friday that all changed – I plunked down a deposit on a Caterham. I’m purchasing it through Kapeña Motors – Rich has been pretty helpful so far and I think he’ll be a great resource once I start building the car.

This isn’t a cheap project mind you. I’ve decided to purchase everything through Caterham, including an engine and transmission. I don’t plan on using them – I plan on selling them. When one buys them through Caterham along with the chassis you get a great deal – I should be able to nab a nice profit on them. Still though, this is a pretty significant outlay – nearly $47k.

It’s a completely reasonable criticism that this is a bit of a waste – I could easily buy a used car and do the swap. I’m choosing not to do this for the simple reason that I want to assemble the car from the ground up in order to learn more about the manufacturing and design of these cars. I suppose I could disassemble and reassemble a car though.

Most of the new cars sans engine/trans are even more than what I’m paying for the whole package – apparently Caterham’s US distribution channel has changed quite a bit, so now it’s much less expensive to get into a car.

Well, onto the specifics! It’s a Caterham 280 in red with the R-pack (Engine – 1.6 liter Ford, LSD, racing seats + belts, sport suspension, quick release steering wheel, carbon fiber dash, upgraded brake master, black pack – cosmetics, light weight flywheel, and some other bits and bobs), 6 speed gearbox, and 13″ racing wheels.

Currently I’m waiting to hear from Caterham if I can get some CAD files of the chassis. I’m not overly optimistic – that seems like it would be quite generous, but the worst answer I’ll get is no. If I do get them I’ll be able to start the design much earlier which would help.

Next up – I need to figure out what exactly I want this car to do – this will help me pick out overall battery and motor specs.